English
English
CLOSE
Top 5 VPN For...
ComparisonBlog
Top 5 VPN For...
ComparisonBlog
The listings featured on this site are from companies from which this site receives compensation. This influences: Appearance, order, and manner in which these listings are presented.Advertising DisclosureTheTopFiveVPN.com is an independent review site funded by referral fees. We may be paid compensation when you buy a VPN through our links. This does not affect our reviews which are based on research and testing. This website tries to cover important VPN providers but we can’t cover all of the solutions that are out there.

How to Watch the Kyle Rittenhouse Trial

The trial of Kyle Rittenhouse is a polarizing event that has captured the attention of Americans. Many are watching the case as a referendum on race and the American legal system.

The 12-person jury is deliberating on five felony charges against Rittenhouse. The most serious charge is first-degree intentional homicide, which carries a maximum sentence of life in prison.

Jury selection

The Kyle Rittenhouse trial is one of the most polarizing cases in American history. It's been widely criticized by both sides of the political spectrum and has sparked passionate debates about gun rights, Black Lives Matter protests and self-defense.

Despite all the drama, however, it's important to remember that the case is still in its early stages and hasn't been resolved yet. The jury will decide whether to find Rittenhouse guilty or not guilty.

In the meantime, you can follow the trial on the internet. It will be streamed live on a website called The Verge. There are also several news outlets covering the trial, including CBS, NBC and Fox News.

Prosecutors will be presenting evidence to the jury, and the defense will be arguing for a mistrial. The main piece of evidence the defense wants to re-watch is footage from a drone that shows Rittenhouse shooting Joseph Rosenbaum.

The video prosecutors have shown the jury appears to show a man running toward Rittenhouse and throwing a plastic bag at him before shots ring out and Rosenbaum dies. It's a piece of evidence that has been a central part of the defense's argument, and it has helped to persuade jurors that Rittenhouse was acting in self-defense when he shot the man.

Another key piece of evidence that the defense has been arguing for is testimony from a police detective that Rosenbaum was a threat to the public. The detective said that he was armed with a chain, set a dumpster on fire and wore a mask.

Finally, the judge has made a number of decisions that have been described as favorable to the defense. In addition to the random drawing of six jurors, he has also allowed several videos to be enlarged for the jury.

This will help the jury better understand what happened during the night of the shootings in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Many of the images are hard to decipher, but a drone video is particularly useful.

After the jury has voted on the evidence, they will begin deliberations. They will then decide whether Rittenhouse is guilty or not guilty of all seven charges against him. If he is found not guilty, the judge will acquit him and dismiss all the other counts against him.

Opening statements

A jury will decide whether to convict 18-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse of first-degree intentional homicide in the shootings that killed two people and injured a third during protests over police violence in Kenosha last summer. The trial began Tuesday and is expected to last at least five days.

The prosecutor and defense attorneys used opening arguments to paint a picture of what occurred during the chaotic night in August 2020. Both said they had very different outlooks on the events, with prosecutors suggesting Rittenhouse was an outsider drawn to Kenosha by a right-wing call to arms and his attorney saying he had strong ties to the city and had seen livestreams of the protests.

Prosecutors alleged that Rittenhouse clashed with people gathering near a car dealership in Kenosha and fatally shot Joseph Rosenbaum. The defense argued that Rittenhouse fired in self-defense after he was threatened by Rosenbaum and that his actions were reasonable under Wisconsin law.

At the trial, Rittenhouse's lawyer Mark Richards displayed photos and video clips of the shootings on a computer monitor. He leaned forward and occasionally turned toward the jurors, appearing to gauge their reactions.

He portrayed the shootings as part of a chaotic night in Kenosha, one that started with a group of people cleaning up graffiti and ended with an armed mob chasing Rittenhouse down the street. He said that during the chaotic events, Rittenhouse had attempted to run away multiple times but was pushed and kicked by unknown people, who tried to grab his gun before he was shot. He also shot and missed an unknown man who tried to kick him, but he shot and killed Anthony Huber and Gaige Grosskreutz, according to Richards.

Schroeder has been criticized for refusing to let prosecutors refer to the men who were shot as "victims," but he gave his defense lawyers latitude in how they describe them - calling them "looters" or "rioters" if they can prove it. Experts say that is fairly common in cases where the defendant is accused of using force to defend themselves.

Schroeder's decision to allow his defense attorneys to talk about political beliefs during the jury selection process was controversial, but he told reporters that it was necessary in order to ensure that the jury is representative of the public. The judge said that he would consider the possibility of sequestering the jury during the trial, but there is no chance he will do so.

Witnesses

The jury heard starkly different portrayals of Kyle Rittenhouse -- instigator or victim. Prosecutors said he set the bloodshed in motion when he triggered a confrontation with a man that night and then killed him with a bullet to the back, while the defense team laid out their case that Rittenhouse was actually the victim of an encounter with protesters who chased him.

Prosecutors emphasized that the first victim, Joseph Rosenbaum, had been armed with a pistol at the time of the shootings and was running toward Rittenhouse. A video director for the conservative news website The Daily Caller, Richard McGinniss, testified that he saw Rosenbaum "engage in a very low and athletic movement," adopting a position that looked like he was trying to get to the barrel of Rittenhouse's gun.

Another witness, a woman who had driven to Kenosha that evening with her handgun, testified that she and other armed people were taunted by the crowd in the area. She told jurors that Rosenbaum "made some very aggressive remarks."

A Car Source worker who was guarding the company's property that night said he did not ask anyone to help protect the property amid the unrest. He testified that he saw Rittenhouse at the lot after the shootings, looking sweaty and pale.

During the trial, the defense introduced photographs and videos from the scene, showing the crowd chasing Rittenhouse and Rosenbaum as he tried to run away. They also showed photos of Huber, who was shot in the arm, and Grosskreutz, who was hit in the bicep by Rittenhouse's shot.

The defense also used an enlarged image taken by a drone, which was allowed into evidence but only after the attorneys sparred over whether the state crime lab would be able to do a thorough analysis on it. Judge Bruce Schroeder agreed that the image could be admitted, but he warned that he does not know what technology was used to enlarge the image.

On the night of the shootings, Rosenbaum and Huber were walking around a car dealership on Sheridan Road when they were confronted by Rittenhouse, who was wearing a hoodie. The men were arguing about who should be a leader, and Rittenhouse pointed his rifle at Rosenbaum.

Jury deliberations

After a long trial, jurors are now in the process of deciding whether teen Kyle Rittenhouse is guilty or not of the crimes he's charged with. They're examining hours of livestreamed video that shows Rittenhouse killing two men and injuring another, and trying to figure out how he fired his gun.

The case has shaped debates over Second Amendment rights, self-defense and violence at racial justice protests. It has also highlighted a divide in how people view police and the justice system.

Prosecutors and defense attorneys in Rittenhouse's trial offered vastly different narratives of the shootings. Those narratives were reflected in the deliberations that led to Thursday's not guilty verdict.

A racial divide was apparent in the jury's decisions, with members of both sides appearing fatigued and ill-at-ease throughout the three days of deliberations. Many appeared to be putting their hands on their chins or rubbing their eyes.

It was a different story from the prosecution's point of view, which argued that Rittenhouse shot the men because he feared for his life and because he believed they were attacking him. A jury found Rittenhouse not guilty on the charges of first-degree intentional homicide, attempted intentional homicide and reckless endangerment.

But Rittenhouse is facing a raft of other criminal charges, including one that carries life in prison if he's convicted. That's a tough charge to win, requiring the jury to determine whether Rittenhouse killed Joseph Rosenbaum and Anthony Huber in the course of his armed patrols.

As the trial moved into its third day, prosecutors began asking questions that could make it harder for jurors to reach a conviction. They asked Richie McGinniss, an online videographer who was a few feet away from Rosenbaum when he died, to explain what happened. He said that Rosenbaum — who he called "a bipolar aggressor" — chased Rittenhouse, tried to grab his rifle and then lunged for it.

Swart, a woman who was with Rosenbaum that night, said her fiancee had taken medication earlier in the day. She said it was for bipolar disorder and depression. That answer opened the door for prosecutors to ask her what she had in her possession when Rittenhouse was on his patrol.

March Big Saving!
Special Deal: 12 Months + 3 Months FREE
Protect Your Privacy on Any Device!
People we follow
If you enjoyed reading this article, you might want to follow an online privacy leader we appreciate:
https://twitter.com/JulesPolonetsky
footer-our-mission
Disclaimer: TopFiveVpn is a website that publishes VPN reviews of top rated VPN services. As an advertising-supported comparison and review site, we may be compensated for featuring certain VPN providers. TopFiveVPN does not support the use of VPNs for unlawful means. Users are solely responsible for their actions. We do not assign or transfer your rights and obligations to any third party. Third-party websites are governed by their own terms and conditions. Reviews and information are provided for general information purposes only. We use our reasonable efforts to include accurate and up to date information on the website, but we do not guarantee to keep the entire content revised at all times.
footer-linksTitle
Operated by TopFiveVPN.com.Ⓒ 2024 All Rights Reserved